Section 1: MC-H ans MetaPDF comparison  

PDF4LHC Combination method benchmarks

The relevant comparisons are those for the "MC-H" and "Meta" sets. Other comparisons are for illustration purposes only.
Table of Contents
Section 1: MC-H ans MetaPDF comparison
Subsection 1.1: PDF comparison
Subsubsection 1.1.1: MC-H
Subsubsection 1.1.2: Meta
Subsubsection 1.1.3: MC-H (NLO)
Subsubsection 1.1.4: Meta (Meta900 prior)
Subsection 1.2: Luminosity comparison
Subsubsection 1.2.1: MC-H
Subsubsection 1.2.2: Meta
Subsubsection 1.2.3: MC-H (NLO)
Subsubsection 1.2.4: Meta (Meta900 prior)
Subsection 1.3: Phenomenology comparison
Subsubsection 1.3.1: MC-H
Subsubsection 1.3.2: Meta
Subsubsection 1.3.3: MC-H(NLO)
Subsubsection 1.3.4: META(NLO)
Subsubsection 1.3.5: Meta (Meta900 prior)
Subsection 1.4: Correlations
Subsubsection 1.4.1:  MC2H 30 vs Meta 30
Subsubsection 1.4.2:  MC2H 50 vs Meta 50
Subsubsection 1.4.3:  MC2H 100 vs Meta 100
Subsubsection 1.4.4: MC2H 30 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 30
Subsubsection 1.4.5: MC2H 50 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 50
Subsubsection 1.4.6: MC2H 100 vs Meta (Meta900 prior) 100
Section 2: CMC
Subsection 2.1: Phenomenology comparison
Subsubsection 2.1.1: NLO
Subsubsection 2.1.2: NNLO
Subsection 2.2: Correlations
Subsubsection 2.2.1: NNLO
Subsubsection 2.2.2: NLO
  Section 1: MC-H ans MetaPDF comparison